Why? Because, though you’ve spent three years seated at the foot of a hoja
who gives lessons in an out-of-the-way neighborhood religious school for
twenty silver coins a day—today you can buy twenty loaves of bread with that
amount—you still wouldn’t know who the hell Bihzad was. It was obvious
that the twenty-coin Hoja Effendi didn’t know who Bihzad was either. All
right then, let me explain. I said:
“I’ve painted everything, absolutely everything: Our Prophet at the mosque
before the green prayer niche seated together with his four caliphs; in another
book, the Apostle and Prophet of God ascending the seven heavens on the
night of the Ascension; Alexander on his way to China banging on the drum of
a seaside temple to scare off a monster stirring up the ocean with storms; a
masturbating sultan spying on the beauties of his harem swimming naked in
his pool while listening to a lute; a young wrestler sure of victory after
learning all his mentor’s moves, only to be defeated in the presence of the
Sultan at the hands of his mentor who had yet one last trick up his sleeve;
Leyla and Mejnun as children kneeling in a schoolroom with exquisitely
decorated walls, falling in love while reciting the Glorious Koran; the inability
of lovers, from the most embarrassed to the most crass, to look at each other;
the stone by stone construction of palaces; the punishment by torture of the
guilty; the flight of eagles; playful rabbits; treacherous tigers; cypress and plane
trees that held magpies; Death; competing poets; feasts to commemorate
victory; and men like you who see nothing but the soup before them.”
The reserved clerk was no longer afraid, he even found me entertaining and
was smiling.
“Your Hoja Effendi must’ve had you read this, you’ll know it,” I continued.
“There’s a story I love from Sadi’s Garden. You know the one, King Darius
306
becomes separated from the crowd during a hunt and goes off to roam the
hills. Unexpectedly, a dangerous-looking stranger with a goatee appears before
him. The king falls into a panic and reaches for the bow on his horse,
whereupon the man begs, ”My king, hold off from shooting your arrow. How
is it that you haven’t recognized me? Am I not the loyal groom to whom
you’ve entrusted a hundred horses and foals? How many times have we seen
each other? I know each of your hundred horses by temperament and
disposition, nay, by color even. So then, how is it you pay no attention to us,
the servants under your command, even those like myself whom you
encounter with such frequency?“”
When I depict this scene, I render the black, chestnut and white horses—so
tenderly cared for by the groom in a heavenly green pasture covered with
flowers of every imaginable color—with such happiness and calm that even
the dullest of readers would understand the moral of Sadi’s story: The beauty
and mystery of this world only emerges through affection, attention, interest
and compassion; if you want to live in that paradise where happy mares and
stallions live, open your eyes wide and actually see this world by attending to
its colors, details and irony.
This progeny of the twenty-coin hoja was at once entertained and
frightened by me. He wanted to drop his spoon and flee, but I didn’t give him
the chance.
“This is how the master of masters Bihzad depicted the king, his groom and
the horses in that picture,” I said. “For a hundred years miniaturists haven’t
stopped imitating those horses. Each horse rendered out of Bihzad’s
imagination and heart has become a model of form. Hundreds of miniaturists,
including myself, can draw those horses from memory. Have you ever seen a
picture of a horse?”
“I once saw a winged horse in an enchanting book that a great teacher, a
scholar of scholars, had presented to my late hoja.”
I didn’t know whether I should push the head of this clown into his soup,
who, along with his teacher, had taken Strange Creatures seriously, and drown
him or leave him to describe in glowing terms the only horse picture he’d ever
seen in his life—in who knows how poor a manuscript copy. I came up with a
third alternative, and that was to drop my spoon and quit the shop. After
walking for a long while I entered the abandoned dervish lodge, where I was
overcome with a sense of peace. I tidied up and without doing anything else, I
listened to the silence.
307
Later, I removed the mirror from where I kept it hidden and set it upon the
low worktable. Next, I placed the two-page illustration and the drawing board
on my lap. When I could see my face in the mirror from where I sat, I
attempted to draw my portrait in charcoal. I drew for a long time, patiently.
Much later, when I saw that once again the face on the page didn’t resemble
my face in the mirror, I was filled with such misery that tears welled in my
eyes. How did the Venetian painters that Enishte described with such flourish
do it? I then imagined myself to be one of them, thinking that if I illustrated in
that state of mind, I could perhaps make a convincing self-portrait.
Later still, I cursed the European painters and Enishte both, erased what I’d
done and began looking into the mirror anew to begin another drawing.
Ultimately, I found myself wandering the streets again, and then, here, at
this despicable coffeehouse. I wasn’t even sure how I happened to come here.
As I entered, I felt such embarrassment about mingling with these miserable
miniaturists and calligraphers that sweat accumulated on my forehead.
I sensed that they were watching me, alerting each other of my presence
with their elbows, and laughing—all right, I could plainly see them doing it. I
seated myself in the corner, trying to behave naturally. At the same time my
eyes sought the other masters, my dear brethren with whom, at one time, I’d
served as Master Osman’s apprentice. I was certain each of them was also
asked to draw a horse this evening and that they’d each expended great
desperate efforts, taking the contest arranged by these idiots quite seriously.
The storyteller effendi hadn’t yet begun his performance. The picture
hadn’t even been hung up yet. I was forced to socialize with the coffeehouse
crowd.
So be it then, let me be frank with you: Like everyone else I, too, made
jokes, told indecent stories, kissed my companions on the cheeks with
exaggerated gestures, spoke in double entendres, innuendos and puns, asked
how the young assistant masters were doing, and like everybody else,
mercilessly needled our common enemies; and after I really warmed up, I went
so far as to roughhouse and kiss men on the neck. Yet, knowing that a part of
my soul remained mercilessly silent when I involved myself in such behavior
caused me unbearable torment.
Nonetheless, before long, I not only succeeded in using figurative language
to compare my own cock, and those of others that were much-talked about, to
brushes, reeds, coffeehouse pillars, flutes, newel posts, door knockers, leeks,
minarets, lady fingers in heavy syrup, pine trees, and twice, to the world itself,
308
I was equally successful in comparing the asses of much-discussed pretty boys
to oranges, figs, small haycocklike pastries, pillows and also to tiny anthills.
Meanwhile, the most conceited of the calligraphers my age was only able to
compare his own tool—quite amateurishly and without any self-confidence I
might add—to a ship’s mast and a porter’s pole. Furthermore, I made
allusions to old miniaturists’ dicks that would no longer rise; the cherry-
colored lips of new apprentices; master calligraphers who hoarded their
money (as did I) in a certain place (“the most disgusting nook”); how perhaps
opium had been put into the wine I was drinking instead of rose petals; the
last great masters of Tabriz and Shiraz; the mixing of coffee and wine in
Aleppo; and the calligraphers and beautiful boys to be found there.
At times it seemed that one of the two spirits within me had, in the end,
emerged victorious, leaving the other behind, and that I’d finally forgotten
that silent and loveless aspect of myself. At these times I remembered the
holiday celebrations of my childhood during which I was able to be myself
along with my kith and kin. Despite all these jokes, kisses and embraces, there
was still a silence within me that left me suffering and isolated in the heart of
the crowd.
Who had endowed me with this silent and merciless spirit—it was not a
spirit but a jinn—which always chided me and cut me off from others? Satan?
But the silence within me was eased, not by the crass mischief instigated by
Satan, on the contrary, by the most pure and simple stories that drove into
one’s soul. Under the influence of wine, I told two stories, hoping that this
would grant me peace. A tall, pale, yet pinkish-complected calligrapher’s
apprentice focused his green eyes onto mine and was listening to me with rapt
attention.
Two Stories on Blindness and Style
the Miniaturist Told to Ease the Loneliness in His Soul
ALIF
Contrary to what is assumed, making drawings of horses by looking at actual
horses wasn’t a discovery of European masters. The original idea belonged to
the great master Jemalettin of Kazvin. After Tall Hasan, the Khan of the
Whitesheep, conquered Kazvin, the old master Jemalettin was not content to
simply join the book-arts workshop of the victorious khan; instead he headed
out on campaign with him, claiming that he wanted to embellish the khan’s
309
History with scenes of war he’d witnessed himself. So this great master, who
for sixty-two years had made pictures of horses, cavalry charges and battles
without ever having seen a battle, went to war for the first time. But before he
could even see the thunderous and violent clash of sweating horses, he lost his
hands and his eyesight to enemy cannon-fire. The old master, like all genuine
virtuosos, had in any case been awaiting blindness as though it were Allah’s
blessing, and neither did he treat the loss of his hands as a great deficiency. He
maintained that the memory of a miniaturist was located not in the hand, as
some insisted, but in the intellect and the heart, and furthermore, now that he
was blind, he declared that he could see the true pictures, scenery and essential
and flawless horses that Allah commanded be seen. To share these wonders
with lovers of art, he hired a tall, pale-skinned, pink-complected, green-eyed
calligrapher’s apprentice to whom he dictated exactly how to draw the
marvelous horses that appeared to him in God’s divine darkness—as he
would’ve drawn them had he been able to hold a brush in his hands. After the
master’s death, his account of how to draw 303 horses beginning from the left
foreleg was collected by the handsome calligrapher’s apprentice into three
volumes respectively entitled The Depiction of Horses, The Flow of Horses and The
Love of Horses, which were quite widely liked and sought after for a time in the
regions where the Whitesheep ruled. Though they appeared in a variety of new
editions and copies, were memorized by illustrators, apprentices and their
students and were used as practice books, after Tall Hasan’s Whitesheep
nation was obliterated and the Herat style of illustration overtook all of Persia,
Jemalettin and his manuscripts were forgotten. Doubtless, the logic behind
Kemalettin R?za of Herat’s violent criticism of these three volumes in his book
The Blindman’s Horses, and his conclusion that they ought to be burned, had
figured in this turn of events. Kemalettin R?za claimed that none of the horses
described by Jemalettin of Kazvin in his three volumes could be a horse of
God’s vision—because none of them were “immaculate,” since the old master
had described them after he’d witnessed an actual battle scene, no matter
how briefly. Since the treasures of Tall Hasan of the Whitesheep had been
plundered by Sultan Mehmet the Conqueror and brought to Istanbul, it
should come as no surprise that occasionally certain of these 303 stories
appear in other manuscripts in Istanbul and even that some horses are drawn
as instructed therein.
310
LAM
In Herat and Shiraz, when a master miniaturist nearing the end of his days
went blind from a lifetime of excessive labor, it would not only be taken as a
sign of that master’s determination, but would be commended as God’s
acknowledgment of the great master’s work and talent. There was even a time
in Herat when masters who hadn’t gone blind despite having grown old were
regarded with suspicion, a situation that compelled quite a few of them to
actually induce blindness in their old age. There was a long period during
which men reverently recalled artists who blinded themselves, following in the
path of those legendary masters who’d done so rather than work for another
monarch or change their styles. And it was during this age that Abu Said,
Tamerlane’s grandson from the Miran Shah line of descent, introduced a
further twist in his workshop after he’d conquered Tashkent and Samarkand:
The practice of paying greater homage to the imitation of blindness than to
blindness itself. Black Veli, the old artisan who inspired Abu Said, had
confirmed that a blind miniaturist could see the horses of God’s vision from
within the darkness; however, true talent resided in a sighted miniaturist who